INDIANAPOLIS (AP) - A disciplinary panel says Indiana Attorney General Curtis Hill isn't immune from the state Supreme Court's attorney discipline process just because he's an elected statewide official.
The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission filed a complaint last month saying Indiana's high court should discipline Hill over allegations he drunkenly groped a lawmaker and three legislative staffers at a bar.
Hill opposes the complaint reaching the investigative stage, arguing in part that Indiana voters will hold him accountable.
The commission's attorneys say the case should proceed, arguing that Hill is seeking "special and favorable treatment" because of his elected post no other Indiana lawyer could ever obtain.
A special prosecutor declined in October to pursue criminal charges against Hill, who's denied wrongdoing and refused calls to resign .
(Copyright 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
- Panel: Discipline case against Indiana AG should proceed
- Indiana House panel backs bill raising smoking age to 21
- Panel recommends boosting Indiana’s cigarette age to 21
- Indiana Senate panel backs hate crimes bill
- Panel accuses Indiana attorney general of misconduct
- Indiana AG won't resign amid groping allegation
- Ex-Indiana high court justice to hear case against state AG
- Indiana House panel backs lifting Sunday alcohol sales ban
- Indiana Senate panel delays vote on hate crime bill
- Indiana House panel dumps proposed handgun licensing repeal