9-0 ruling masks deep division on gerrymandering at Supreme Court

The Supreme Court's rejection of Democrats' challenge to districts they say were rigged on a partisan basis by Wiscon...

Posted: Jun 19, 2018 9:44 AM
Updated: Jun 19, 2018 9:44 AM

The Supreme Court's rejection of Democrats' challenge to districts they say were rigged on a partisan basis by Wisconsin Republicans came on a 9-0 vote, but dueling opinions revealed internal conflicts and portend difficulty ahead for any future gerrymandering claim.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote Monday that the Democratic challengers lacked legal "standing" because they had not demonstrated individual harm within their legislative districts.

The court, therefore, sidestepped the salient question of whether federal judges may ever take up constitutional claims to the partisan gerrymanders proliferating across a polarized America, or determine how far politicians may or may not go in their quest to secure legislative majorities.

That was not the end of the matter for Justice Elena Kagan. Writing a concurring opinion for the four liberal justices, Kagan warned of the "evils of gerrymandering" to democracy and tried to offer a blueprint for future plaintiffs to prove injury on various constitutional grounds -- including a First Amendment right of free association.

But Roberts retorted that her opinion, essentially, does not matter. The court's ruling, he said, was set forth in his opinion "and none other." And while the court did not close the door on eventual review of partisan gerrymanders, it put out no welcome map. Roberts's opinion showed none of Kagan's concern for the way gerrymandering could rig elections, as the country heads to the 2020 Census and redistricting cycle.

The chief justice's concerns focused on when -- and perhaps subtly, whether -- judges should ever be involved in the map-drawing process. At oral arguments last fall, Roberts said that if judges began reviewing politically lopsided maps, siding with either Democrats or Republicans, their actions would be viewed as simply favoring one party over another.

"This court is not responsible for vindicating generalized partisan preferences," Roberts wrote Monday. "The court's constitutionally prescribed role is to vindicate the individual rights of the people appearing before it."

Justice Anthony Kennedy, a conservative centrist who has previously suggested the court could at some point rule on a partisan gerrymander, possibly based on a First Amendment right of free association, did not write a separate statement in the Monday case.

For her part, Kagan, joined by liberal Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor, said that if the court does not soon intervene, the problem would only get worse. Redistricting software enables whichever party controls a statehouse to capture every bit of partisan advantage, she wrote, helping entrench the party in power, irrespective of voters' true preferences.

The method at issue in the Wisconsin case was "packing and cracking," by which voters of one party are consolidated ("packed") into districts where they can prevail by a great majority but effectively waste votes, and are divided ("cracked") among multiple districts so they fail to gain a majority in any of those districts.

Roberts noted that the Wisconsin Democrats claimed their votes had been unconstitutionally diluted. But he said they did not make the case for individual harm within specific districts. Rather, much of the plaintiffs' evidence addressed the statewide partisan advantage arising from the packing and cracking. That, Roberts asserted, made the case "about group political interests, not individual legal rights."

As he sent the case back to a lower court in Wisconsin, Roberts said the plaintiffs must "prove concrete and particularized injuries using evidence -- unlike the bulk of the evidence presented thus far -- that would tend to demonstrate a burden on their individual votes.

"We express no view on the merits of the plaintiffs' case," he added. "We caution, however, that standing is not dispensed in gross: A plaintiff's remedy must be tailored to redress the plaintiff's particular injury."

Two of Roberts's fellow conservatives, Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, said they did not believe the challengers should have another chance to prove standing.

Kagan, alternatively, offered suggestions on how challengers could get their claim heard, including if it were a broad-based assertion of a First Amendment violation based on free association.

Referring to the claim directly before the court, she said, to demonstrate individual harm "a Democratic plaintiff living in a 75% Democratic district could prove she was packed by presenting a different map, drawn without a focus on a partisan advantage, that would place her in a 60% Democratic district. Or conversely, a Democratic plaintiff residing in a 35% Democratic district could prove she was cracked by offering an alternative, neutrally drawn map putting her in a 50-50 district.

"The precise numbers are of no import," Kagan wrote. "The point is that the plaintiff can show, through drawing alternative district lines, that partisan-based packing or cracking diluted her vote."

Kagan also addressed a legal route that Kennedy has previously suggested based on the First Amendment right of association held by political parties and their members.

"Consider an active member of the Democratic Party in Wisconsin who resides in a district that a partisan gerrymander has left untouched (neither packed nor cracked)," Kagan posited. "His individual vote carries no less weight than it did before. But if the gerrymander ravaged the party he works to support, then he indeed suffers harm, as do all other involved members of that party."

Contesting Roberts' narrower conception, she asserted, "When the harm alleged is not district specific, the proof needed for standing should not be district specific either. ... The complaint ... is that the gerrymander has burdened the ability of like-minded people across the state to affiliate in a political party and carry out that organization activities and objects."

Indiana Coronavirus Cases

Data is updated nightly.

Confirmed Cases: 52037

Reported Deaths: 2762
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Marion12111693
Lake5677249
Elkhart366260
Allen2971134
St. Joseph221169
Hamilton1735101
Cass16489
Hendricks1470100
Johnson1351118
Porter84938
Vanderburgh8016
Tippecanoe7859
Clark71944
Madison68164
LaPorte62928
Howard61058
Bartholomew60545
Kosciusko5844
Marshall57011
Noble52428
Boone49244
LaGrange48710
Delaware48152
Jackson4793
Hancock47436
Shelby46025
Floyd41844
Monroe36128
Morgan34431
Grant32226
Dubois3196
Henry30318
Montgomery29720
Clinton2903
White27810
Dearborn27123
Warrick26829
Vigo2618
Decatur25732
Lawrence25325
Harrison21822
Greene19932
Miami1942
Jennings17912
Putnam1748
DeKalb1694
Scott1659
Wayne1596
Daviess15117
Perry15110
Steuben1402
Orange13823
Jasper1362
Ripley1357
Franklin1288
Gibson1282
Wabash1193
Carroll1142
Starke1093
Fayette1087
Whitley1086
Newton10110
Huntington942
Jefferson872
Wells831
Randolph804
Fulton761
Jay720
Knox710
Washington681
Pulaski661
Clay645
Posey640
Rush623
Spencer591
Owen531
Benton510
Sullivan511
Adams491
Brown441
Blackford402
Fountain362
Crawford330
Tipton331
Switzerland320
Parke280
Martin260
Ohio230
Vermillion200
Warren151
Union140
Pike120
Unassigned0193

Ohio Coronavirus Cases

Data is updated nightly.

Confirmed Cases: 66853

Reported Deaths: 3064
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Franklin12301449
Cuyahoga9359399
Hamilton7046208
Lucas3079306
Marion275539
Montgomery257936
Summit2382209
Pickaway222942
Mahoning1971239
Butler189747
Columbiana139560
Stark1244116
Lorain118970
Trumbull106678
Warren101826
Clark82010
Delaware76315
Fairfield71917
Lake62723
Tuscarawas62110
Licking60012
Medina59932
Belmont57324
Clermont5157
Miami51431
Wood51051
Portage50960
Ashtabula45244
Geauga43143
Richland3906
Allen38541
Wayne37655
Greene3659
Mercer30410
Erie30122
Holmes2625
Darke26126
Huron2602
Madison2259
Ottawa21724
Athens1921
Sandusky17615
Ross1503
Washington14720
Putnam14515
Coshocton1434
Crawford1405
Jefferson1272
Morrow1271
Hardin12512
Union1151
Auglaize1124
Muskingum1061
Preble961
Lawrence920
Clinton912
Monroe8917
Hancock871
Hocking839
Guernsey824
Scioto770
Shelby774
Williams772
Carroll713
Logan711
Ashland692
Fulton680
Wyandot665
Brown621
Fayette580
Highland581
Champaign571
Knox571
Defiance553
Van Wert491
Perry481
Seneca442
Henry370
Paulding340
Jackson310
Pike290
Adams282
Vinton232
Gallia211
Noble140
Harrison131
Meigs130
Morgan120
Unassigned00
Fort Wayne
Clear
59° wxIcon
Hi: 86° Lo: 63°
Feels Like: 59°
Angola
Overcast
57° wxIcon
Hi: 85° Lo: 63°
Feels Like: 57°
Huntington
Clear
58° wxIcon
Hi: 85° Lo: 63°
Feels Like: 58°
Decatur
Clear
59° wxIcon
Hi: 86° Lo: 64°
Feels Like: 59°
Van Wert
Clear
59° wxIcon
Hi: 86° Lo: 64°
Feels Like: 59°
Warmer Tuesday
WFFT Radar
WFFT Temperatures
WFFT National

Community Events