SEVERE WX : Winter Weather Advisory View Alerts

DACA ruling further complicates complex legal path forward

DACA may have won a court victory Tuesday night, but the decision only makes the legal path forward murkier.Th...

Posted: Apr 25, 2018 9:08 PM
Updated: Apr 25, 2018 9:08 PM

DACA may have won a court victory Tuesday night, but the decision only makes the legal path forward murkier.

The complexity only adds to the likelihood DACA will remain intact for many months if not longer, despite President Donald Trump's initial plan to begin its termination in early March.

A federal judge in Washington became the third judge to say the Trump administration has failed to adequately justify its decision to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which protects young undocumented immigrants who came to the US as children. Judge John Bates, however, went further than judges who have preliminary put the end of the program on hold and ordered the administration to renew DACA permits, by ordering the administration to begin accepting new applicants unless it can issue a new memo justifying its decision that satisfies him within 90 days, at which point the ruling will take effect.

But rather than provide clarity on the future of DACA, the ruling only adds layers of complexity to an existing morass in the courts about the program's future.

"This further muddies the litigation on this issue," said Stephen Yale-Loehr, an immigration attorney with Miller-Mayer and Cornell Law School professor. "Overall it's a pretty murky area for everyone involved, there's no certainty for DACA recipients, or employers, or the government, in terms of what's going on."

Multiple appeals

Before Bates' ruling on Tuesday, two appellate courts were already considering cases on DACA, the 9th Circuit and 2nd Circuit. The case in the 9th Circuit, out of California, is farther along, with oral arguments scheduled for May.

In both cases, a district court judge, one in California and one in New York, has issued a nationwide ruling that the rescinding of DACA last September is not likely to pass muster legally, ordering the Department of Homeland Security to resume considering renewal applications for the two-year work permits and protections from deportations.

The Supreme Court has already declined an administration request to leapfrog those courts and consider the DACA rescission immediately.

So even before the ruling, DACA was likely to remain intact for months. Once the 9th Circuit hears arguments it could issue a ruling at any time, and it could preserve or overturn the lower court's decision. But even if it were to overturn the decision -- something court experts find unlikely -- the judge's ruling out of New York would remain operative nationwide, so it would take the 2nd Circuit also overturning that region's case -- another outcome considered unlikely -- to result in DACA being terminated. The odds of both courts ruling that DACA can be terminated immediately in the next few months is slim, experts say.

It is likely the cases will eventually end up before the Supreme Court once the appeals process runs its course, but that would almost certainly take place in the next term, October at the earliest, and a court ruling of that magnitude could take months to complete.

Tuesday's ruling

On top of that existing case patchwork, Tuesday's ruling adds a new wrinkle. Bates, a Republican appointee nominated by President George W. Bush, went farther than the previous judges in two respects. First, he issued an opinion not just as a preliminary move while the case is decided on its merits -- he issued a judgment on the actual merits of the case, meaning if his order was finalized in 90 days, it would be permanent, not preliminary, subject to appeal.

Second, because of that, Bates effectively overturned the administration's move on DACA itself -- meaning that the program will be restored in full including new applications unless the Justice Department and DHS issue a new memo that he determines is adequate.

Bates was heavily skeptical in his decision of the administration's reasoning that a threat to sue the DACA program brought by Texas and a handful of other states meant it was likely a court would immediately throw out DACA entirely. In a statement reacting to the ruling, the Justice Department doubled down on that reasoning and has not offered any other justification for ending the program since September.

The next steps only get more complicated. If DHS were to issue a new memo rescinding DACA, lawyers could argue the 9th Circuit and 2nd Circuit cases are moot and that challenge process would need to start over, similar to what has happened with the President's travel ban cases. But it's not guaranteed the courts will accept that argument.

If Bates finalizes his order, it could mean the resumption of DACA in its entirety as the other cases make their way through the courts, though that, too, would likely end up before the circuit court overseeing DC.

Timeline for resolution

The complicated legal situation means the future of DACA likely won't be resolved for months if not a year.

"If you were in Las Vegas, where you would put the odds on a final decision on this iteration of DACA is May 2019," said Leon Fresco, an immigration attorney who used to work in the Obama administration Justice Department. "There is basically no chance that the DACA program writ large is gone any time before middle of 2019."

Fresco said the odds of the government winning at the 9th Circuit, 2nd Circuit and DC Circuit were "1 million to one."

"There's just no chance," Fresco said. "If (the administration) thought they had a chance, yesterday's opinion lays it to rest."

The administration still has reason to believe it may win before the Supreme Court, where the addition of Justice Neil Gorsuch by Trump could break a previous 4-4 split on a related -- but different -- deferred action case in favor of the Trump administration. But Fresco estimated given the timeline for the Supreme Court likely scheduling arguments next fall, a decision would be unlikely before the following spring. If a new memo were to restart litigation over, that could delay that process.

"The question on DHS' side is do they want to try to slow down the rumble to the Supreme Court taking their time on this decision, or do they want to take their chances that Gorsuch and (swing vote Justice Anthony) Kennedy will go their way?" Fresco said. "At some point you have to make an analysis as to where this is more likely to end. And do you think you are likely to win now in the Supreme Court, or do you want to take the time making a new memo?"

Indiana Coronavirus Cases

Data is updated nightly.

Cases: 708779

Reported Deaths: 13226
CountyCasesDeaths
Marion966191721
Lake51761946
Allen39224672
Hamilton34549405
St. Joseph34157541
Elkhart27356432
Vanderburgh22081394
Tippecanoe21853212
Porter17935299
Johnson17544374
Hendricks16822310
Clark12697190
Madison12353337
Vigo12219244
Monroe11469166
LaPorte11162204
Delaware10366184
Howard9664211
Kosciusko9134114
Hancock7990139
Bartholomew7893155
Warrick7691155
Floyd7563176
Wayne6906198
Grant6844171
Boone6556100
Morgan6405138
Dubois6085117
Marshall5786108
Dearborn570376
Cass5685102
Henry5579101
Noble542683
Jackson493569
Shelby479495
Lawrence4342118
Gibson429089
Harrison428570
Clinton419753
Montgomery418086
DeKalb411184
Whitley380239
Huntington379880
Miami372865
Knox366689
Steuben365757
Putnam353160
Jasper350946
Wabash347878
Adams338052
Ripley334668
Jefferson313180
White308454
Daviess289499
Wells286481
Decatur279092
Fayette277262
Greene270785
Posey268833
Scott261153
LaGrange253670
Clay253544
Randolph235680
Washington231031
Spencer228031
Jennings225047
Fountain208845
Sullivan207942
Starke204752
Owen192356
Fulton192039
Jay186429
Carroll185920
Perry180736
Orange177853
Rush170724
Vermillion166043
Franklin165635
Tipton161043
Parke144616
Blackford133831
Pike130334
Pulaski113845
Newton104234
Brown100140
Crawford97614
Benton97113
Martin82915
Warren79715
Switzerland7698
Union69910
Ohio55811
Unassigned0408

Ohio Coronavirus Cases

Data is updated nightly.

Cases: 1054807

Reported Deaths: 18991
CountyCasesDeaths
Franklin1225191356
Cuyahoga1074592069
Hamilton783261168
Montgomery50176996
Summit45557909
Lucas40298765
Butler37768570
Stark31513895
Lorain24246473
Warren23910293
Mahoning20946583
Lake20067362
Clermont19459229
Delaware18085130
Licking16149207
Fairfield15757197
Trumbull15627460
Medina14922259
Greene14706236
Clark13660293
Wood12806185
Portage12431196
Allen11352229
Richland11067198
Miami10548214
Muskingum8717127
Wayne8594209
Columbiana8569226
Pickaway8439121
Marion8390135
Tuscarawas8387240
Erie7600154
Hancock6730123
Ross6707146
Geauga6553146
Ashtabula6530165
Scioto6295101
Belmont5634158
Union558447
Lawrence5470102
Jefferson5343147
Huron5314114
Darke5273121
Sandusky5189120
Seneca5139120
Washington5087107
Athens503856
Auglaize476284
Mercer471984
Shelby456590
Knox4397108
Madison423959
Putnam421799
Ashland413488
Fulton410567
Defiance404296
Crawford3883101
Brown386955
Logan374476
Preble371098
Clinton362160
Ottawa357978
Highland347459
Williams328674
Champaign321557
Jackson308551
Guernsey307549
Perry290549
Fayette278048
Morrow275939
Hardin264764
Henry264366
Coshocton259857
Holmes253499
Van Wert239262
Pike233831
Gallia233446
Adams229152
Wyandot227553
Hocking209759
Carroll189447
Paulding168838
Meigs141738
Noble132937
Monroe128941
Morgan106823
Harrison105636
Vinton81614
Unassigned02
Fort Wayne
Cloudy
38° wxIcon
Hi: 39° Lo: 36°
Feels Like: 38°
Angola
Cloudy
36° wxIcon
Hi: 38° Lo: 36°
Feels Like: 31°
Huntington
Cloudy
37° wxIcon
Hi: 40° Lo: 36°
Feels Like: 37°
Fort Wayne
Cloudy
38° wxIcon
Hi: 41° Lo: 37°
Feels Like: 38°
Lima
Cloudy
41° wxIcon
Hi: 42° Lo: 38°
Feels Like: 37°
A strong cold front will bring rain and accumulating snow to the Midwest Tuesday along with frigid temperatures overnight.
WFFT Radar
WFFT Temperatures
WFFT National

Community Events